Stop the Scam – How to Prevent Welfare Fraud in Your State
1) Coordinate Local, County, State, and Federal social programs from the client’s perspective. Set up one-stop centers 2) Shift the burden of paperwork away from the client. People who may not have a mailing address in a week are being 3) If there is a significant (months long) wait for. The three-step solution ensures individuals applying for welfare benefits are who they say they are and eligible to receive benefits; tracks welfare recipients already enrolled in programs to ensure they are still eligible; and prosecutes welfare fraudsters to the full extent of the law to deter future scams and recover funds paid out to perpetrators.
Identifying and eliminating welfare fraud requires dedicated teamwork between the Department of Human Services and the Office of Inspector General. The department is responsible for overseeing its programs for any suspected waste, fraud, and abuse and sends suspicious data to the Office of Inspector General for review and potentially an investigation. The OIG inspects recipient fraud. DHS inspects provider fraud. Click the "Report Provider Fraud" button above if you see any of these examples of Provider Fraud and Abuse including but not limited to :.
Between the period May 1,how do you check history on internet explorer April 30,the welfare fraud hotline has:. Find out more about the Inspector General's current investigations and prosecutions in the links below.
Increase access to health care. Develop a skilled workforce that meets the needs of Pennsylvania's business community. Provide universal access to high-quality early childhood education. Provide high-quality supports and protections to vulnerable Pennsylvanians. You may be trying to access this site from a secured browser on the server. Please enable scripts and reload this page. An Official Pennsylvania Government Website. Department of Human Services. Report Abuse. Apply for Benefits.
Find Facilities. Review Data. DHS Sites. Contact Us. DHS Blog. Page Content. Of the complaints received, 2, field investigations were conducted by the Office of Inspector General. Data provided by the Office of Inspector General Find out more about the Inspector General's current investigations and prosecutions in the links below. Government that Works Increase access to health care. Jobs that Pay Develop a skilled workforce that meets the needs of Pennsylvania's business community.
Schools that Teach Provide universal access to high-quality early childhood education. Government that Works Provide high-quality supports and protections to vulnerable Pennsylvanians.
Government that Works
Apr 04, · 10 Ways to Fix the Welfare System 1) Coordinate Local, County, State, and Federal social programs from the client’s perspective. Set up one-stop centers where caseworkers are empowered to assess the full range of the client’s needs, and give them the mandate to make client’s work-ready within the month. Identifying and eliminating welfare fraud requires dedicated teamwork between the Department of Human Services and the Office of Inspector General. The department is responsible for overseeing its programs for any suspected waste, fraud, and abuse and sends suspicious data to the Office of Inspector General for review and potentially an investigation.
I urge anyone who reads this blog to forward the information to local as well as national political representatives. Share this information with your friends and neighbors so they start to use their votes to shape welfare policy in an effective, positive way. What follows is the essence of my observations and experience. When people are poor, exhausted, in pain, and on the edge of homelessness — and probably traumatized by their situation — it is difficult for them to find all the resources and services they need.
A single point of access would also make it easier to address welfare fraud without demeaning and criminalizing everyone who applies for social services. People who may not have a mailing address in a week are being besieged with paperwork, a ridiculous amount of small print, and bureaucratic procedures that make no sense from their point of view. Social workers are too over-worked to answer questions, and no one has an overview. Yet the paperwork is filled with threatening language about the consequences of doing something wrong, or failing to turn something in that you received a week after the deadline, or demanding documentation of things that are impossible to document like the dollar you had to beg on the street in order to get to the required Social Services appointment.
Need I say that the desperate struggle to surmount this mountain of paperwork and survive the months, and even years, of bureaucratic process creates an enormous disincentive to give up any form of subsistence you eventually obtain? The number one thing keeping people from working is the lack of available jobs.
If the taxpayer wants to require people who are able to work to get a job instead of dole money, then they need to be given a job directly. The disability situation is even more complicated: if it takes up to two years to qualify for SSDI, and the disabled person is unable to work, how do they support themselves during those two years?
Are people required to become homeless before being declared disabled? If the disability claim is rejected, the bridge money can be regarded as a loan to be paid back once the person gets a job. Dithering for months and years just makes things worse. In the months after that, the caseworker forgets to arrange for the services called for in the plan, and the client — who has been holding on by his or her fingernails during this months of process — starts to consider suicide.
When patients are referred to specialists, get them to that specialist with a month, and automatically schedule a follow-up appointment with the primary care physician within a month. When the county hospital takes over a year to arrange specialist appointments, all the other programs which require health documentation fall into limbo. There should be incentives for doctors who save the taxpayers money by enabling a welfare recipient to work. If transportation is only provided after a year-long application process how was the client supposed to follow up on job interviews during that year?
If transportation is only allowed for job interviews, how is the client supposed to get food or go to subsistence-related appointments?
Also, how does it make sense for a person without an income to be required to go to another city to apply for a bus pass, and pay a fee for the bus pass, before they can qualify to get transportation money to pay for the bus pass?
Stamps and print-outs and thank you note stationary cost money. Toll calls to other cities to arrange appointments or pursue job interviews costs money. People who need help with heating and other utility costs should not have to call a long distance number to obtain an application. Transportation to appointments costs money. Broken appointments mean wasted money. The well-meaning tip to dye your hair for job interviews costs money. What does a person without an income do when they no longer have pens and paper to take down important information?
These are just the examples that immediately come to mind. For instance, a month without transportation can mean missed job interviews or a skipped referral appointment that took months to arrange. Sometimes costs can be imposed through other well-meaning social measures: for instance, in California there is a surcharge for grocery bags that can be subtracted from the already meager food-stamp money.
Social Services and other programs that serve indigent clients should automatically accommodate disability by allowing people to sit while waiting for their turn. The current DMV-esque situation makes disabled people wait in a line that winds around the block before they can even ask about accommodation for their disability. Also, some Social Services offices require disabled people to be accompanied by a friend or relative before they can get accommodation.
Even if a person on the edge of homelessness has friends and relatives, will they be able to take a day off from their own work for a depressing day at Social Services? Once a person is on welfare, they have to choose the intensive job hunt.
Under the current arrangements the training goes to people with the leisure to to not search for work very intensively: i. Learning new skills might actually lift them from their dire situation, as well as giving them a social outlet.
Large employers should offer programs like Cisco did in the 90s: specific technical training with a guaranteed job upon completion. Once a person becomes homeless, it will be a lot more difficult and expensive to help them recover from whatever situation they are in.
And by that time, the client will be suffering from trauma, additional health problems, and the loss of all the material accoutrements of their identity. Their first letter from a boyfriend — gone. The manuscript of the novel that was supposed to be published one day — gone.
The pet that loved you — gone. If a person has no income and no remaining savings or other resources, and they meet the criteria to be eligible for food stamps and general assistance, then ALL relevant services that could help them recover should kick in at that point.
People need work to escape from poverty. Forcing them into homelessness and heaping more stress onto what is already an emotionally paralyzing situation just so they will qualify for help in obtaining employment is ludicrous. If policymakers see fit to address these things, then maybe people will get off the welfare rolls faster or even get help before they end up having to resort to welfare.
However, these changes should result in such vast cost savings as well as the bounty from adding people back into the productive workforce that all levels of government will have the means to pay for all the efficiency and enforcement professionals the system needs. Right now we have the worst of all worlds: welfare recipients are not getting the help they need; providers of fake help and do-nothing bureaucrats are getting fat on the backs of the poor; and politicians are making their careers on bashing the most marginalized people in society and too busy making straw men to even look at the real people — their constituents — who have ended up on welfare.
To make matters worse, very few welfare recipients have the writing skills, speaking opportunities, or social positions to raise awareness of their situation.
This blog post is not copyrighted or constrained in any way. If you want to help, simply help spread the word about what welfare is and how to fix it. If you have friends, relatives, or neighbors who have been caught up in the welfare system, encourage them to speak up and write about their experience.
Most of all, raise awareness of how the last line of defense against human catastrophes often just makes the catastrophe worse. Want to actually help someone? Hook them up with a job that enables them to maintain a roof over their head, do their laundry, and put food on the table.
And if there is no job for them, face the truth of what it means to deny a person a living income. What do you expect them to do? You are commenting using your WordPress.
You are commenting using your Google account. You are commenting using your Twitter account. You are commenting using your Facebook account. Notify me of new comments via email. Notify me of new posts via email. This entry was tagged civil rights , disability , economy , fake help , faux help , food stamps , general assistance , health care , helpiness , homeless , how to fix welfare , hunger , indigent , Medicaid , poverty , public assistance , safety net , SNAP , social justice , social services , tanf , truth about welfare , unemployment , welfare , welfare-to-work.
Bookmark the permalink. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:. Email required Address never made public. Name required.
<- What does a gs12 make annually - How to create multiple websites in iis->